|
|
|
RELATED
SERVICES:
MEDICAL VS EDUCATIONAL

Clarification, again, on the issue of medical vs. educational related
services has been revisited. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor
of a 16 year old, Garret Frey, that he and other children needing
health care supports in school, are entitled to receive such under
IDEA Individual with Disabilities Act. Garret's needs for health care
includes such procedures as urinary catheterization, suctioning his
tracheotomy, etc. These related services do not necessarily need a
nurse as they could be performed by a qualified/trained layperson.
This Decision hopefully will reaffirm the argument that related services
are not "medical services" unless they require that they
be performed by a physician, and, must be provided by a school district,
when determined needed by a qualified professional, and at the request
of a disabled student as a related service. This upholds an earlier
Supreme Court Decision in Irving Independent School District v.
Tatro.
|